How Ford, GM and Stellantis stocks performed for week ending May 22 - USA Today
How Ford, GM and Stellantis stocks performed for week ending May 22 USA Today
Resolver-driven radar and ticker monitoring with null-safe catalyst hooks for the later 4B merge.
WATCHING: 1 active source(s), confirmation 0.89.
How Ford, GM and Stellantis stocks performed for week ending May 22 USA Today
Source: https://www.dataroma.com/m/stock.php?sym=VITL 9 different executives, about $400k in total, from May 13th through today. This enough to signal a catalyst forthcoming? Date Filed Reporting Name Relationship Trans. Date Shares Price $ Total Value $ 20 May 2026 FLANAGAN GLENDA J Director 18 May 2026 6,100 8.33 50,813 19 May 2026 COON STEPHANIE Chief Strategy Officer 15 May 2026 5,895 8.42 49,636 19 May 2026 RUIZ GISEL Director 13 May 2026 6,151 8.13 50,008 19 May 2026 AMOO-GOTTFRIED KOFI OWUSU Director 15 May 2026 2,375 8.45 20,069 18 May 2026 KENNEDY KELLY J. Director 14 May 2026 2,500 8.40 21,000 18 May 2026 MCKEON KATHRYN CMO and GM, Butter 14 May 2026 604 8.28 5,001 18 May 2026 CYR WILLIAM B. Director 14 May 2026 6,000 8.52 51,120 18 May 2026 PAPPAS PETER NICHOLAS CSO and President, Eggs 14 May 2026 3,500 8.51 29,785 18 May 2026 HOLLAND JOSEPH MICHAEL Chief Supply Chain Officer 14 May 2026 12,484 8.00 99,872 15 May 2026 POST DENNY MARIE Director 13 May 2026 3,000 8.23 24,690 submitted by /u/ecm27 [link] [comments]
Wenn NVIDIA heute Abend einen klaren Beat liefert aber noch den Ausblick nicht anhebt („Raise“), rechne ich mit einer deutlichen Kapitalrotation aus den Mega-Cap-Techs heraus. In diesem Szenario könnten insbesondere der Russell 2000 sowie Risiko-Assets wie der Cannabissektor, Kryptowährungen und generell Small Caps massiv profitieren – ähnlich wie während der Rotation 2021. Ich hoffe genau auf dieses Setup 😎😁 Die spannende Frage wäre dann: Welche Aktien könnten davon am stärksten profitieren? submitted by /u/Win11141 [link] [comments]
Stock prices for Ford, GM and Stellantis for the week ending May 15 USA Today
Moin zusammen, ich brauche mal eure ehrliche Meinung zu meiner aktuellen Situation. Ich hatte bis zum 30. April eine komplette GME-Position. Einen Tag bevor die eBay-Übernahme bekannt gemacht wurde, habe ich zufällig alles verkauft. Habe die komplette seitwärts Phase seit 2 Jahren mitgenommen und hatte einfach kein Bock mehr... Mein ursprünglicher Plan war eigentlich: kurz raus aus GME, das Geld zwischenzeitlich woanders arbeiten lassen, mehr Rendite machen und später mit mehr Kapital wieder mehr GME-Aktien kaufen. Inzwischen hat sich meine Meinung aber etwas geändert. Ich bin mir nicht mehr sicher, ob ich überhaupt wieder zurück in GME will. Meine Bedenken aktuell: - mögliche anstehende Verwässerung - Schuldenaufnahme - keine echte persönliche Überzeugung von eBay - unklar, ob die Story für mich noch so stark ist wie vorher Das freigewordene Geld steckt aktuell größtenteils in Calls, vor allem Software/Tech. Siehe Screenshot. Jetzt die Frage an euch: Was haltet ihr von meiner aktuellen Positionierung in Software-Calls? Habe bewusst eine lange Laufzeit gewählt um etwas Risiko rauszunehmen. Viele reden ja auch von einer anstehenden Sektorrotation, da sehe ich mich mittelfristig eigentlich ganz gut aufgestellt... der gestrige MSFT push hat mir wieder etwas Hoffnung gegeben. Und würdet ihr gerade noch in GME investieren? Ich denke ich warte erstmal ab bis zu dem Übernahmeangebot etwas mehr Details bekannt werden... kann mir gerade nicht vorstellen das sich GME kurzfristig erholt. submitted by /u/HillStonk [link] [comments]
DSRSD welcomes new assistant GM, finance director Pleasanton Weekly
Da nahezu der gesamte Finanzsektor nach den Zahlen gestiegen ist, tendiere ich auch dazu, Figma lang zu gehen. Sie wirken schon ziemlich abgestraft auf mich. View Poll submitted by /u/User_Arbeit [link] [comments]
submitted by /u/Medium-Damage2469 [link] [comments]
Trump's China trip, Nadella's testimony, GM layoffs and more in Morning Squawk CNBC
Im großen Bruder wird aktuell viel Über Figma und Monday geschrieben. Jemand da der sich etwas auskennt? 🙈 PlugPower könnte jetzt so richtig starten nach den Zahlen oder? Rigetti auf längere Sicht ein guter Kandidat oder? submitted by /u/Open_Construction_88 [link] [comments]
🗓 Trading RKC starts now 🔁 Pair: RKC/USDT 🌐 Network: Solana Chain Trade Here 🗓 Trading GME starts now 🔁 Pair: GME/USDT 🌐 Network: Solana Chain Trade Here Discover early stage innovation and start trading in the KuCoin Alpha Zone. early-stage More Details submitted by /u/DS_Soul [link] [comments]
I'm fucking retarded so I full ported Figma ahead of earnings on 14th Position: 1900 shares @ $20.39 submitted by /u/Stumpgrinder123 [link] [comments]
ACHTUNG! Ich bin schwer mental herausgefordert daher habe ich KI zur Bewertung der Aktie verwendet, investieren auf eigene Gefahr! Du siehst Xerox fallen. Tief. Schulden drücken wie Ketten, Verluste stapeln sich, Bären umzingeln dich – brüllend, spottend: „Ende der Fahrt!“ Dein Herz rast, aber du hältst fest. Warum? Weil du weißt: Das ist nur der Anfang. Plötzlich surrt es. Deine Maschinen erwachen – klug, hungrig. Sie denken, sie lernen. Einnahmen strömen wie ein Fluss, Schulden schmelzen im Nu. Du spürst die ersten Früchte: Dividenden für dich, den Treuen. Die Bären heulen auf, doch du lachst leise. Nun die Leiter. Sprosse 1: Neue Tech pumpt Umsatz. Sprosse 2: Schuldenfrei, stärker. Sprosse 3: Höher, vorbei an Spöttern. Du kletterst unerbittlich – Leiter um Leiter – direkt zum Mond. Hell, triumphierend, dein Platz oben. Die Bären starren hoch, klein und leer. Du? Du erntest den Schatz. Du hältst durch. Du steigst auf. $XRX ruft dich. FULL DD – Kurz und knackig! 📊 KEY METRICS (Q1 2026 Update): • Umsatz BOOM: +27% auf 1,85 Mrd. USD 🤑 • KUV: 0,03 – extrem günstig! 💎 • Rally: +99% in 4 Wochen (1,22€ → 2,37€) 📈 • Divi: 4–15% Yield (18 Jahre straight!) 💰 • AI-Turn: EPS -0,08 → +0,86 USD (2027) 🤖 • Debt: Sinkt mit FCF +250 Mio. 📉 • Ziel: 4,50–10 USD (Analysten + Bull-Case) 🌙 🖨️ XEROX STORY: Lexmark-Deal = Umsatz-Rocket! Drucker drucken jetzt GEWINNE statt Verluste! 🐻 FUD DEBUNKED: Debt? Umsatz > Debt schon jetzt Bears rekt! YOLO DECISION: 💎🙌 CALLS 📞 (Moon-Ticket) oder 🐻 PUTS 📉 (FUD-Fallen)? COMMENT DEINE POSITION! 🔥 [Quelle: Trading-Treff, BoerseGlobal, Q1 Report] submitted by /u/Yung_Ceejay [link] [comments]
I hope this is the right sub for this question but I have no clue where to ask this. If you think there is a sub better fit please tell me. Anyway: I started investing only a "short" while back and after some time learned about the GME squeeze incident. Naturally I also started visiting this sub and then, after a short while, noticed there are quite a few GME related subs and also one (maybe more?) sub whose whole stick is hating on GME inevstors. From an outsiders perspective this is really interesting and I want to learn more about the dynamics, history and psychology of all of this. First: How do so many people believe there will still be a moass? So far, after all this years, nothing really happend. Trend is also more downwards than up. There are theories about all sorts of mechanisms at play, from billions of naked shorts to whatnot, but there is no hard evidence. Is it that people have invested so much that now they have to grasp at this final straw? Second: Why are people hating on them and why is there even a sub for it? I think a lot of them are people who also invested in GME and lost money and now have to actively hate/make fun of others as kind of defense mechanism? Are there other subs whose only purpose is hating a stock or investors? Why do people use their time to write negative stuff abour things they are (in theory) not invested in? What is going on with all of this? Isn't it kinda interesting or strange or whatever you wanna call it? submitted by /u/raynzor12 [link] [comments]
Updated GME EBAY Merger DCF The deal is potentially possible. So I have to entertain it and create a DCF model. I updated my GME EBAY Merger DCF model because the previous model was messy, and the inputs did not align with Ryan Cohen's transformational vision for EBAY. I included Ryan Cohen's $2b in cost saving measures under synergies, and I also improved EBAY's assumptions to align closer to the 40% EBIT margin that RC is striving for. This DCF model projects free cash flows from GME and EBAY separately, and adds synergies to the total operating profit. Operating assumptions Bear case Terminal growth rate: 1.5% EBAY: Revenue Growth: 0.5%, EBIT Margin 30% RC expects to improve EBIT Margin to 40%, so this bear case underachieves his goal GME: Revenue Growth: 0%, EBIT Margin: 7% Quite low and similar to 2025's EBIT margin Cost synergy EBIT ramp up to 2030 up to $750m Revenue synergy EBIT stagnates at $50m by 2030 Integration costs $950m the first 3 years Base case Terminal growth rate: 2.0% EBAY: Revenue Growth: 1.5%, EBIT Margin: 34% Modest increase from the bear case, but still not fully achieving RC's goal GME: Revenue Growth: 2%, EBIT Margin: 10% Modest improvements to GME's operations Cost synergy EBIT ramps up to $1.3b by 2030 Revenue synergy EBIT reaches $225m by 2030 Integration costs increase to $1.35b RC Bull case Terminal growth rate: 2.5% EBAY: Revenue growth: 3.0%, EBIT Margin 39% - practically reaching RC's vision GME: Revenue growth: 4.0%, EBIT Margin: 14% GME benefits significantly from synergies Cost synergy EBIT improves to $2b by 2030 Revenue synergy EBIT significantly increases to $600m by 2030 Integration costs increase to $1.7b across the first 4 years I tested issuance prices of $25, $32, and $40, and I noticed equity value per share fluctuations. Diluting at $25 per share is most harmful, while diluting at $32+ leads to accretion. Issuance price is critical for the execution of this acquisition, and while the Base Case 50% cash, 50% shares leads to a share count of 1.6b shares outstanding and an equity value per share of $23.11, there is significant upside to $27-$30 if shares are issued at $32 or $40 respectively. Lastly, I tested financial stress tests, entertaining the idea of different consideration mixes. I kept the base operating case assumptions the same across these stress tests. Base Stress 70% Cash 30% Shares, Issuance price $25: Equity value per share decreases to $22.11, compared to the 50/50 mix base case with an equity value per share of $23.11. Debt increased over $10b, more debt = bad I tested the opposite next, Base Stress 30% Cash 70% Shares Issuance price $25: Equity value per share increases to $23.70 compared to the base 50/50 mix $23.11. Shares outstanding increased over 500m. More dilution = accretion! I encourage you to create a copy for yourself and create your own cases based on your own assumptions. This Merger DCF model shows that the deal is possible, and issuance price and debt heavily influence outcomes beyond operating assumptions and synergies. submitted by /u/onerivenpony [link] [comments]
So, GME CEOs Account wurde bei Ebay gesperrt. Als Short halter, hoffe dies darf man als nein zum Deal betrachten 🍀 submitted by /u/Mr_Akihiro [link] [comments]
GME EBAY Merger DCF Sheet I built a merger DCF for a hypothetical GME-eBay deal and the biggest driver of outcomes was not just synergies, but the price at which GME decides to issue stock and the amount of debt from paying in cash. I tested bear, base, and bull operating cases, then varied the dilution price at $25, $35, and $50, plus separate stock-heavy and cash-heavy financing structures. I used a share-count framework where issuing shares at lower prices creates very large new-share counts with dilution. This is a scenario analysis model, and some scenarios may not be possible under current authorized-share constraints. Scenario Share Price Debt Total Shares (Diluted) Bear 50/50 $25 $ 12.30 $ 27,240.00 1,659 Bear 50/50 $35 $ 15.21 $ 27,240.00 1,342 Bear 50/50 $50 $ 18.49 $ 27,240.00 1,104 Base 50/50 $25 $ 13.64 $ 27,240.00 1,659 Base 50/50 $35 $ 16.87 $ 27,240.00 1,342 Base 50/50 $50 $ 20.50 $ 27,240.00 1,104 Bull 50/50 $25 $ 22.58 $ 27,240.00 1,659 Bull 50/50 $35 $ 27.92 $ 27,240.00 1,342 Bull 50/50 $50 $ 33.93 $ 27,240.00 1,104 Stock-Heavy Base $25 $ 16.95 $ 16,140.00 2,103 Cash-Heavy Base $25 $ 11.19 $ 41,115.00 1,104 Findings At a 50/50 cash-stock mix, the base case rises from $13.64 at $25 dilution to $16.87 at $35 and $20.50 at $50, showing how sensitive the deal is to issuance price. The enterprise value does not change, only the amount of shares issued. Interestingly, more debt is not automatically better than more dilution. The stock-heavy base case with 70% shares, 30% cash reached $16.95 , while the cash-heavy base case containing 25% shares, 75% cash fell to $11.19 , even though the latter had far fewer shares outstanding. Conclusion If a deal like this ever happened, shareholders should care most about three things: the stock issuance price, the debt burden, and whether management can actually realize the projected synergies. submitted by /u/onerivenpony [link] [comments]
Ich bin gerade in Medellín und habe die Nonne mit der GME-Tasche gesehen. Gott scheint jedenfalls auf der Seite von GME zu sein! submitted by /u/No-Storage-Left [link] [comments]
Folgt mir für mehr Finanztipps" title="GME / ebay -> Folgt mir für mehr Finanztipps" /> Auch ein blindes Huhn findet mal ein Korn. Aber irgendwie war es ja schon offensichtlich :( https://preview.redd.it/76azafjee2zg1.png?width=1540&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff9a7a6f8ab607fac0e939d0204d56165958e183 submitted by /u/admix85 [link] [comments]
Hallo! Angesichts der jüngsten Berichte über die Übernahme von eBay durch GME: Meint ihr, es wäre an der Zeit, nächste Woche mit GME oder eBay schnell Geld zu verdienen? Was meint ihr? https://preview.redd.it/8q2jvyg7ryyg1.jpg?width=940&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b673294c7b9be65016d3c63d56003d1db9fd833f submitted by /u/thetruthgate [link] [comments]
How Ford, GM and Stellantis stocks performed for week ending May 22 USA Today
Source: https://www.dataroma.com/m/stock.php?sym=VITL 9 different executives, about $400k in total, from May 13th through today. This enough to signal a catalyst forthcoming? Date Filed Reporting Name Relationship Trans. Date Shares Price $ Total Value $ 20 May 2026 FLANAGAN GLENDA J Director 18 May 2026 6,100 8.33 50,813 19 May 2026 COON STEPHANIE Chief Strategy Officer 15 May 2026 5,895 8.42 49,636 19 May 2026 RUIZ GISEL Director 13 May 2026 6,151 8.13 50,008 19 May 2026 AMOO-GOTTFRIED KOFI OWUSU Director 15 May 2026 2,375 8.45 20,069 18 May 2026 KENNEDY KELLY J. Director 14 May 2026 2,500 8.40 21,000 18 May 2026 MCKEON KATHRYN CMO and GM, Butter 14 May 2026 604 8.28 5,001 18 May 2026 CYR WILLIAM B. Director 14 May 2026 6,000 8.52 51,120 18 May 2026 PAPPAS PETER NICHOLAS CSO and President, Eggs 14 May 2026 3,500 8.51 29,785 18 May 2026 HOLLAND JOSEPH MICHAEL Chief Supply Chain Officer 14 May 2026 12,484 8.00 99,872 15 May 2026 POST DENNY MARIE Director 13 May 2026 3,000 8.23 24,690 submitted by /u/ecm27 [link] [comments]
Wenn NVIDIA heute Abend einen klaren Beat liefert aber noch den Ausblick nicht anhebt („Raise“), rechne ich mit einer deutlichen Kapitalrotation aus den Mega-Cap-Techs heraus. In diesem Szenario könnten insbesondere der Russell 2000 sowie Risiko-Assets wie der Cannabissektor, Kryptowährungen und generell Small Caps massiv profitieren – ähnlich wie während der Rotation 2021. Ich hoffe genau auf dieses Setup 😎😁 Die spannende Frage wäre dann: Welche Aktien könnten davon am stärksten profitieren? submitted by /u/Win11141 [link] [comments]
Stock prices for Ford, GM and Stellantis for the week ending May 15 USA Today
Moin zusammen, ich brauche mal eure ehrliche Meinung zu meiner aktuellen Situation. Ich hatte bis zum 30. April eine komplette GME-Position. Einen Tag bevor die eBay-Übernahme bekannt gemacht wurde, habe ich zufällig alles verkauft. Habe die komplette seitwärts Phase seit 2 Jahren mitgenommen und hatte einfach kein Bock mehr... Mein ursprünglicher Plan war eigentlich: kurz raus aus GME, das Geld zwischenzeitlich woanders arbeiten lassen, mehr Rendite machen und später mit mehr Kapital wieder mehr GME-Aktien kaufen. Inzwischen hat sich meine Meinung aber etwas geändert. Ich bin mir nicht mehr sicher, ob ich überhaupt wieder zurück in GME will. Meine Bedenken aktuell: - mögliche anstehende Verwässerung - Schuldenaufnahme - keine echte persönliche Überzeugung von eBay - unklar, ob die Story für mich noch so stark ist wie vorher Das freigewordene Geld steckt aktuell größtenteils in Calls, vor allem Software/Tech. Siehe Screenshot. Jetzt die Frage an euch: Was haltet ihr von meiner aktuellen Positionierung in Software-Calls? Habe bewusst eine lange Laufzeit gewählt um etwas Risiko rauszunehmen. Viele reden ja auch von einer anstehenden Sektorrotation, da sehe ich mich mittelfristig eigentlich ganz gut aufgestellt... der gestrige MSFT push hat mir wieder etwas Hoffnung gegeben. Und würdet ihr gerade noch in GME investieren? Ich denke ich warte erstmal ab bis zu dem Übernahmeangebot etwas mehr Details bekannt werden... kann mir gerade nicht vorstellen das sich GME kurzfristig erholt. submitted by /u/HillStonk [link] [comments]
DSRSD welcomes new assistant GM, finance director Pleasanton Weekly
Da nahezu der gesamte Finanzsektor nach den Zahlen gestiegen ist, tendiere ich auch dazu, Figma lang zu gehen. Sie wirken schon ziemlich abgestraft auf mich. View Poll submitted by /u/User_Arbeit [link] [comments]
submitted by /u/Medium-Damage2469 [link] [comments]
Trump's China trip, Nadella's testimony, GM layoffs and more in Morning Squawk CNBC
Im großen Bruder wird aktuell viel Über Figma und Monday geschrieben. Jemand da der sich etwas auskennt? 🙈 PlugPower könnte jetzt so richtig starten nach den Zahlen oder? Rigetti auf längere Sicht ein guter Kandidat oder? submitted by /u/Open_Construction_88 [link] [comments]
🗓 Trading RKC starts now 🔁 Pair: RKC/USDT 🌐 Network: Solana Chain Trade Here 🗓 Trading GME starts now 🔁 Pair: GME/USDT 🌐 Network: Solana Chain Trade Here Discover early stage innovation and start trading in the KuCoin Alpha Zone. early-stage More Details submitted by /u/DS_Soul [link] [comments]
I'm fucking retarded so I full ported Figma ahead of earnings on 14th Position: 1900 shares @ $20.39 submitted by /u/Stumpgrinder123 [link] [comments]
ACHTUNG! Ich bin schwer mental herausgefordert daher habe ich KI zur Bewertung der Aktie verwendet, investieren auf eigene Gefahr! Du siehst Xerox fallen. Tief. Schulden drücken wie Ketten, Verluste stapeln sich, Bären umzingeln dich – brüllend, spottend: „Ende der Fahrt!“ Dein Herz rast, aber du hältst fest. Warum? Weil du weißt: Das ist nur der Anfang. Plötzlich surrt es. Deine Maschinen erwachen – klug, hungrig. Sie denken, sie lernen. Einnahmen strömen wie ein Fluss, Schulden schmelzen im Nu. Du spürst die ersten Früchte: Dividenden für dich, den Treuen. Die Bären heulen auf, doch du lachst leise. Nun die Leiter. Sprosse 1: Neue Tech pumpt Umsatz. Sprosse 2: Schuldenfrei, stärker. Sprosse 3: Höher, vorbei an Spöttern. Du kletterst unerbittlich – Leiter um Leiter – direkt zum Mond. Hell, triumphierend, dein Platz oben. Die Bären starren hoch, klein und leer. Du? Du erntest den Schatz. Du hältst durch. Du steigst auf. $XRX ruft dich. FULL DD – Kurz und knackig! 📊 KEY METRICS (Q1 2026 Update): • Umsatz BOOM: +27% auf 1,85 Mrd. USD 🤑 • KUV: 0,03 – extrem günstig! 💎 • Rally: +99% in 4 Wochen (1,22€ → 2,37€) 📈 • Divi: 4–15% Yield (18 Jahre straight!) 💰 • AI-Turn: EPS -0,08 → +0,86 USD (2027) 🤖 • Debt: Sinkt mit FCF +250 Mio. 📉 • Ziel: 4,50–10 USD (Analysten + Bull-Case) 🌙 🖨️ XEROX STORY: Lexmark-Deal = Umsatz-Rocket! Drucker drucken jetzt GEWINNE statt Verluste! 🐻 FUD DEBUNKED: Debt? Umsatz > Debt schon jetzt Bears rekt! YOLO DECISION: 💎🙌 CALLS 📞 (Moon-Ticket) oder 🐻 PUTS 📉 (FUD-Fallen)? COMMENT DEINE POSITION! 🔥 [Quelle: Trading-Treff, BoerseGlobal, Q1 Report] submitted by /u/Yung_Ceejay [link] [comments]
I hope this is the right sub for this question but I have no clue where to ask this. If you think there is a sub better fit please tell me. Anyway: I started investing only a "short" while back and after some time learned about the GME squeeze incident. Naturally I also started visiting this sub and then, after a short while, noticed there are quite a few GME related subs and also one (maybe more?) sub whose whole stick is hating on GME inevstors. From an outsiders perspective this is really interesting and I want to learn more about the dynamics, history and psychology of all of this. First: How do so many people believe there will still be a moass? So far, after all this years, nothing really happend. Trend is also more downwards than up. There are theories about all sorts of mechanisms at play, from billions of naked shorts to whatnot, but there is no hard evidence. Is it that people have invested so much that now they have to grasp at this final straw? Second: Why are people hating on them and why is there even a sub for it? I think a lot of them are people who also invested in GME and lost money and now have to actively hate/make fun of others as kind of defense mechanism? Are there other subs whose only purpose is hating a stock or investors? Why do people use their time to write negative stuff abour things they are (in theory) not invested in? What is going on with all of this? Isn't it kinda interesting or strange or whatever you wanna call it? submitted by /u/raynzor12 [link] [comments]
Updated GME EBAY Merger DCF The deal is potentially possible. So I have to entertain it and create a DCF model. I updated my GME EBAY Merger DCF model because the previous model was messy, and the inputs did not align with Ryan Cohen's transformational vision for EBAY. I included Ryan Cohen's $2b in cost saving measures under synergies, and I also improved EBAY's assumptions to align closer to the 40% EBIT margin that RC is striving for. This DCF model projects free cash flows from GME and EBAY separately, and adds synergies to the total operating profit. Operating assumptions Bear case Terminal growth rate: 1.5% EBAY: Revenue Growth: 0.5%, EBIT Margin 30% RC expects to improve EBIT Margin to 40%, so this bear case underachieves his goal GME: Revenue Growth: 0%, EBIT Margin: 7% Quite low and similar to 2025's EBIT margin Cost synergy EBIT ramp up to 2030 up to $750m Revenue synergy EBIT stagnates at $50m by 2030 Integration costs $950m the first 3 years Base case Terminal growth rate: 2.0% EBAY: Revenue Growth: 1.5%, EBIT Margin: 34% Modest increase from the bear case, but still not fully achieving RC's goal GME: Revenue Growth: 2%, EBIT Margin: 10% Modest improvements to GME's operations Cost synergy EBIT ramps up to $1.3b by 2030 Revenue synergy EBIT reaches $225m by 2030 Integration costs increase to $1.35b RC Bull case Terminal growth rate: 2.5% EBAY: Revenue growth: 3.0%, EBIT Margin 39% - practically reaching RC's vision GME: Revenue growth: 4.0%, EBIT Margin: 14% GME benefits significantly from synergies Cost synergy EBIT improves to $2b by 2030 Revenue synergy EBIT significantly increases to $600m by 2030 Integration costs increase to $1.7b across the first 4 years I tested issuance prices of $25, $32, and $40, and I noticed equity value per share fluctuations. Diluting at $25 per share is most harmful, while diluting at $32+ leads to accretion. Issuance price is critical for the execution of this acquisition, and while the Base Case 50% cash, 50% shares leads to a share count of 1.6b shares outstanding and an equity value per share of $23.11, there is significant upside to $27-$30 if shares are issued at $32 or $40 respectively. Lastly, I tested financial stress tests, entertaining the idea of different consideration mixes. I kept the base operating case assumptions the same across these stress tests. Base Stress 70% Cash 30% Shares, Issuance price $25: Equity value per share decreases to $22.11, compared to the 50/50 mix base case with an equity value per share of $23.11. Debt increased over $10b, more debt = bad I tested the opposite next, Base Stress 30% Cash 70% Shares Issuance price $25: Equity value per share increases to $23.70 compared to the base 50/50 mix $23.11. Shares outstanding increased over 500m. More dilution = accretion! I encourage you to create a copy for yourself and create your own cases based on your own assumptions. This Merger DCF model shows that the deal is possible, and issuance price and debt heavily influence outcomes beyond operating assumptions and synergies. submitted by /u/onerivenpony [link] [comments]
So, GME CEOs Account wurde bei Ebay gesperrt. Als Short halter, hoffe dies darf man als nein zum Deal betrachten 🍀 submitted by /u/Mr_Akihiro [link] [comments]
GME EBAY Merger DCF Sheet I built a merger DCF for a hypothetical GME-eBay deal and the biggest driver of outcomes was not just synergies, but the price at which GME decides to issue stock and the amount of debt from paying in cash. I tested bear, base, and bull operating cases, then varied the dilution price at $25, $35, and $50, plus separate stock-heavy and cash-heavy financing structures. I used a share-count framework where issuing shares at lower prices creates very large new-share counts with dilution. This is a scenario analysis model, and some scenarios may not be possible under current authorized-share constraints. Scenario Share Price Debt Total Shares (Diluted) Bear 50/50 $25 $ 12.30 $ 27,240.00 1,659 Bear 50/50 $35 $ 15.21 $ 27,240.00 1,342 Bear 50/50 $50 $ 18.49 $ 27,240.00 1,104 Base 50/50 $25 $ 13.64 $ 27,240.00 1,659 Base 50/50 $35 $ 16.87 $ 27,240.00 1,342 Base 50/50 $50 $ 20.50 $ 27,240.00 1,104 Bull 50/50 $25 $ 22.58 $ 27,240.00 1,659 Bull 50/50 $35 $ 27.92 $ 27,240.00 1,342 Bull 50/50 $50 $ 33.93 $ 27,240.00 1,104 Stock-Heavy Base $25 $ 16.95 $ 16,140.00 2,103 Cash-Heavy Base $25 $ 11.19 $ 41,115.00 1,104 Findings At a 50/50 cash-stock mix, the base case rises from $13.64 at $25 dilution to $16.87 at $35 and $20.50 at $50, showing how sensitive the deal is to issuance price. The enterprise value does not change, only the amount of shares issued. Interestingly, more debt is not automatically better than more dilution. The stock-heavy base case with 70% shares, 30% cash reached $16.95 , while the cash-heavy base case containing 25% shares, 75% cash fell to $11.19 , even though the latter had far fewer shares outstanding. Conclusion If a deal like this ever happened, shareholders should care most about three things: the stock issuance price, the debt burden, and whether management can actually realize the projected synergies. submitted by /u/onerivenpony [link] [comments]
Ich bin gerade in Medellín und habe die Nonne mit der GME-Tasche gesehen. Gott scheint jedenfalls auf der Seite von GME zu sein! submitted by /u/No-Storage-Left [link] [comments]
Folgt mir für mehr Finanztipps" title="GME / ebay -> Folgt mir für mehr Finanztipps" /> Auch ein blindes Huhn findet mal ein Korn. Aber irgendwie war es ja schon offensichtlich :( https://preview.redd.it/76azafjee2zg1.png?width=1540&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff9a7a6f8ab607fac0e939d0204d56165958e183 submitted by /u/admix85 [link] [comments]
Hallo! Angesichts der jüngsten Berichte über die Übernahme von eBay durch GME: Meint ihr, es wäre an der Zeit, nächste Woche mit GME oder eBay schnell Geld zu verdienen? Was meint ihr? https://preview.redd.it/8q2jvyg7ryyg1.jpg?width=940&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b673294c7b9be65016d3c63d56003d1db9fd833f submitted by /u/thetruthgate [link] [comments]
Stock prices for Ford, GM and Stellantis for the week ending May 1 USA Today
This is a genuine question. Sorry if the answer is obvious. EBAY made $2B+ on profit last year. They're current trading at around 45-50B market cap. How does GME make them a legitimate offer? I know this sort of thing must be possible because the recent Paramount/WB deal immediately comes to mind. I don't know the specifics of that deal but I'd assume it's a somewhat similar situation, in that one company is trying to buy one that's significantly larger. Where does GME get the money to make an offer that ebay shareholders would want to accept? Will someone lend them the money? Dilution? Please explain submitted by /u/No_Cell6708 [link] [comments]
Rumor is GameStop ($GME) is preparing to make an offer to acquire eBay, per WSJ. That being said say the merger goes through before October. This is what will happen to the GME issued Warrants (a special dividend to shareholders) that expire October 30th 2025? The warrants are set for $32 per share… The $GME warrants would almost certainly remain unchanged and continue functioning exactly as they do now… (currently trading at only $4.34) - exercisable for one share of GameStop common stock at the $32 strike price until their expiration - The warrants are governed by a specific Warrant Agreement (dated October 7, 2025, with Computershare as agent). That agreement includes standard anti-dilution adjustments (for stock splits, dividends, spinoffs, rights offerings, cash dividends, tender/exchange offers, etc.) and a "Share Exchange Event" clause for major corporate restructurings. According to the SEC submitted by /u/uncle-ice493 [link] [comments]
It is hard to believe it has been almost 5-6 years since the meme stock pump started with GME, BB, AMC, NOK. Remember those days? Everyone started creaming the gamma squeeze. GME is back in the news. NOK is quietly ripping and insane YTD return (104%). BB also finished the turnaround and the stock YTD has been solid (42%). I am already seeing many mentions of GME. Whether the offer goes through or not, do you think there will be another round of the rally for the original meme stocks? With their turnaround, the stocks might not be so meme stocks anymore. Regardless, it will be very interesting to see those stocks next Monday. Thoughts? submitted by /u/proudmelon [link] [comments]
The Reason GM Stock Is Beating Ford and Tesla. (It Has Nothing to Do With Cars or Tariffs.) Barron's
HITI currently has over 2.5 million members across Canada, with a long-term goal revised upwards to 4 million from 2.5 million, which has already been exceeded. Market share reached an all-time high, confirming the superiority of HITI’s $Cost model, which makes it unique compared to its peers. Raj’s goal is to convert at least 40% of those members into Elite members! If we assume 4 million subscribers, from the current 2.5 million, we’ll have 1.6 million Elite members with a 40% conversion . Recurring revenue from paid members alone would exceed $64 million, at a cost of $40 per year, but I expect the price to increase in the coming years as competition decreases and HITI gains pricing power, while also increasing GMS. Elite/white label inventory will increase from the current 2% to 25-30% , effectively altering the future GMS resulting from this change (3-4 years). When Hiti raises the price of Elite and White Label memberships, GM will increase significantly. At the current valuation with 70 million in high-margin recurring revenue by 2030 (Only from ELITE) ...if you have a 10-year horizon, it is not financial advice, but buying $HITI shares can turn out to be the best decision imo Furthermore, an Elite customer, just like an Amazon Prime customer, will make repeat purchases and contribute to greater revenue for the company. Don’t measure a company built over decades with a quarterly time horizon. Canna Cabana remains the preferred destination for consumers as data shows: Daily users move the market and are about 2x more likely to shop most often at Canna Cabana than our closest peer Canna Cabana same-store sales have increased 151% between October 2021 and October 2025 as consumers have come to appreciate the offering of our discount club model The average Canna Cabana store nationally was on a $2.6MM annual revenue run rate in October 2025 vs. $1.2MM for peers in the five provinces in which we operate. High Tide is the company with the most data available in its sector of any other. This allows it to anticipate consumer trends and develop white-label products in line with current trends. An overlooked aspect is that the company managed the crisis in BC when the strike broke out last September, causing a 55% drop in sales in the province, due to the strikes in provincial shops. HITI took advantage of this opportunity to increase its market share in BC; with only eight stores, it is now the most well-known chain in the province! A hallmark of efficiency in logistics and management In the past, the company built 20 to 30 stores each year. Now, the situation is changing. A member here made the comparison citing Nike’s early days in the 90’s when it couldn’t meet short-term demand because it didn’t have enough capital to buy more inventory, which is very good news. It means demand for canna cabana products is skyrocketing, while competitors are going out of business. As sales and scale increase, demand increases and so does capital expenditure in the short term. Currently, Hiti is prioritizing market share, building loyalty among its members, and patiently waiting for most of its competitors to exit the market (currently over 3,600 dispensaries in Canada). Long term target, in my opinion, is 500+ stores in Canada which Raj does not want to state his number, because he prefers to raise the target once it has been reached BIG NEWS : BC will double its store limit, perhaps to 32 next year, after what happened with the strikes. HITI will have 32 stores in BC in the long term. Imagine the unpriced revenue from that province! (In reality, nothing is priced by the market at this price.) Canna Cabana is showing the provinces that where its stores are located, the illicit market is significantly declining, and the data shows it. It’s possible , This is just my opinion, that in the future (in a few years), Ontario will further raise the limit to 200 stores, and provinces with government-run stores will allow HITI to open (ex. Quebec). Raj has a clear vision that the cannabis market could exceed 7 bln in Canada in 2-3 years from today Remexian will make a significant contribution to the business model in the future. Hiti’s leverage and scale have allowed the company to purchase tons of medical cannabis at a 40% discount compared to Remexian. This will have a significant impact on Q3 financial figures. The company is evaluating projected sales in the UK, a rapidly growing market, expected in H2. Remexian will play a role at the European level. As Raj has said in the past: “Germany will only be a gateway to Europe. Remexian will be recognized globally within 10 years and will also ship to Australia. currrent estimates for the European medical market, which I think very few people are really aware of, are around a 60 billion € market by 2030, much larger than the current American one. France’s Potential Cannabis Market Is Valued At $8.3 Billion https://thetalmangroup.com/frances-potential-cannabis-market-is-valued-at-8-3-billion/ France is implementing measures to implement cannabis in the national health system In summary: • Most data rich cannabis company in Canada, and potentially out of Canada. This will lead to white lable products tailored directly to consumer’s wants. Overtime increasing profit margins. • market share continues to grow , Raj is in talks with large chains: blocks of 40+ stores • Same store sales up 151% in last 4 years vs -14% for average operator. This demonstrates a clear competitive edge and executional acumen by High Tide. “Stay tuned, this year will have some M&A” • Convert 40-50% of current loyalty members to Elite, leading to over 1M members . Elite paid membership creates a more loyal and sticky client, while generating thick margins through membership subscriptions • Remexian “...its going to be a massive contributor to our financial profile” 2 Tons purchased and landing in March, at about 50% less than what Remexian was paying. Multiple deals coming *inbound*. Remexian will do 4-5 tons per month in the near future. • Significant *inbound* interest from large American operators for licensing or other deals. “Things are looking brighter and brighter” High Tide is running on all cylinders. Its hard to diversify when the company keeps delivering like this Overview on $Cost of #cannabis Latest presentation https://hightideinc.com/presentation/ i am very long term in this company Thanks for reading, share if you like it submitted by /u/WilliamBlack97AI [link] [comments]
Musk and Altman go to trial, GM earnings, Spotify's fitness push and more in Morning Squawk CNBC
GM earnings top estimates, company raises profit forecast after Supreme Court ruling reduces tariff costs Yahoo Finance
Saw post regarding what's undervalued and could 5-10x in coming years. Lithium demand will grow from 1.3m tonnes to 3m tonnes by 2030. Prices have reached high of $85k per tonne back in 2022, dropped to $9k in 2024, and now running back up to $24k in 2026. LAC is the largest lithium deposit in North America, the Department of Energy has backed the mine with 2.6b loan and owns a stake, GM has also backed the mine owning a stake. This is a mine of national security, Lithium batteries are needed for robotics, data centers, EV's, and will enter a growing deficit beginning this year. It takes years to establish new mines, we're too far behind to catch up and it's predicted deficit will continue growing for the next decade. LAC will have 1800 employees on site by end of 2026, engineering is 93% complete. Opening will be end of 2027. Production will go from 40,000 tonnes in 2028 to 160,000 tonnes by 2040. You're basically buying in while it's a hole in the ground, betting on a sector which is erupting with demand dealing with deficit and prices are surging again. This stock can actually 5x-10x and then will most likely pay a nice dividend. It's a long term hold for the next decade. There's mandates to source minerals nationally and stop reliance on CN which this is a part of as well. submitted by /u/breakyourteethnow [link] [comments]
I've browsed through 100s of reddit posts, articles, youtube videos talking about how Claude Design and Google Stitch are going to replace Figma. The stock has plummeted to a new All Time Low after both announcements and I think this creates an opportunity for us regards. Claude Design is fundamentally flawed for the job. Claude Design is actually nothing but a Claude Code wrapper with "Inspect Element" turned on. Claude Design under the hood generates React code, similar to what Claude Code would generate. This is because of the inherent limitations of LLMs - Large Language Models. Emphasis on the word "Language" here. These models generate text and that's it! AI agents, Claude Code, Cursor, etc seem magical because of the harness and capabilities given via shell/bash commands, CLIs, MCPs, etc. All of which take in text data and output text data. By creating harnesses that can execute these commands (which obviously are texts, they are able to achieve results which look and are "magical"). However, designing stuff is fundamentally different. Figma, Adobe XD all have rendering engines that do complex rendering computation to build components which are not some code, but actual elements represented in a renderer. This is something LLMs fundamentally cannot do. They can create an illusion of generating designs via code, but to create something that can natively edit elements - something a professional designer needs to do, needs a rendering engine. Claude Design and Google Stitch are Canva replacements at best. Yes, people will use Claude Design and Google Stitch, but the users are fundamentally different. Someone who's not a designer who needs a quick design goes to Canva today. Instead tomorrow they will go to Claude Design. A professional designer with skills will still go to Figma or Adobe XD. Yes, they might use some AI features in these platforms to speed up their workflow, but they NEED a tool that has some sort of rendering engine to do their job right. Some devs also used to go to websites that offer free website templates, download them for 30 bucks, tweak it, reuse it. They might now use Claude Design to generate something first before feeding it to Claude Code. Sure these users will go to Claude Code and Google Stitch, but they were never Figma users in the first place. Claude Code disrupted Coding, hence Claude Design will disrupt Design This is what the market is pricing in. These two are fundamentally different problems altogether. SDE lifecycle roughly goes like this: requirement gathering -> coding -> testing -> review -> deployment -> iteration -> support. Claude Code takes a stab at the solo part of the SDE work i.e. coding. Devs have their favourite IDEs, terminals, customizations, plugins, fonts, themes, and now AI assistants (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot etc). This part is easy to be replaced since its very individualistic in nature. Replacing any other part of this workflow is hard. Example for review (the collaboration aspect of the job) switching from github to gitlab is an organizational change. Hence Claude created Claude Review which sits inside Github instead of trying to create their own Git hosting service that has a code reviewer. Design, however, is very different. Some credit here goes to Figma itself. Figma has a lot of things integrated in it. Designing, Collaboration, Templates, Versioning, Libraries, etc. Handoffs from Product -> Design -> Devs and iterations all happen inside Figma. The assumption that since Claude Code was able to penetrate in enterprise setting so Claude Design would is very wrong. AI companies are trying to keep the AI hype on. Don't get me wrong, AI is very useful. I use Claude Code every day for my work. Never before in my career I've seen something as useful as these AI tools to help with writing code. I do agree these thing are here to stay, I just think they are a little overhyped. Everyone knows there's a bubble when a footwear company adds AI to their name and the stock jumps 800% in a day. These AI companies need to keep the AI hype train on to justify their insanse valuations. The token subsidization is unreal and once the reality hits on how expensive this all is, AI tools even in software engineering are going to take some hit. Something these LLMs are absolutely meant for -- textual data like coding. The tools that are not meant for these LLMs like pseudo-design tools like Claude Desing will take a larger hit and maybe them as a Canva replacement might be off the table too. Who knows. Soon OpenAI will release their own tool for design like Google and Anthropic to stay relevant. A few YC startups have tried doing this before too, but Figma is here to stay. Apart from all this, of course I can talk about strong fundamentals, CEO compensation incentive, Figma Make, etc but you can look all of those up separately. Instead, I am here to show the bigger picture the market is missing. Positions - 50k, deep in figma balls. submitted by /u/the_average_no_one [link] [comments]
How Ford, GM and Stellantis stocks performed for week ending April 24 USA Today
Ford, GM, Stellantis stock down for week ending April 24 Detroit Free Press
Ford, GM and BorgWarner seen as positive setups ahead of Q1 earnings Investing.com
Chevy Blazer EV Discount, Lease, Finance Deals For April 2026 GM Authority
I have been using Claude Design and Google Stitch the past couple days and holy shit is Figma absolutely cooked. I genuinely think Figma will be bankrupt in the next couple years, Claude Design and Google Stitch are absolutely better products and are faster and easier to use than Figma. Investing in Figma today is like investing in Blockbuster when Netflix released. All this fear about SAAS getting destroyed is pretty overblown but for Figma they are absolutely gone like this company will not be here in 5 years with the amount of better competition they have now, if your a software engineer you know this already. Also a lot of people are acting like companies wont switch meanwhile the vast majority of the best companies are all using Claude Code, the switch to Claude Design will absolutely be the easiest software switch for top companies across the world. Figma has zero moat and has no price leverage, the fact they are losing hundreds of millions of dollars is pretty concerning seeing how if they increase prices companies will just switch over to Claude design which most companies are already using Claude and wont have trouble switching to Claude design and the companies who already have google workspace contracts will switch to Google Stitch. It's also not a great sign when the companies founders, CEO and executives and private investors are all selling off their shares as fast as humanely possible. Most Figma employees are selling as fast as possible and most probably sell the second their shares vest. They all know what retail investors don't and just guess what it is. Just try Google Stitch and Claude Design before you defend Figma and see what I am talking about. In 10 years people will talk about Figma the same way people talk about Chegg and Blockbuster. submitted by /u/Drink_noS [link] [comments]
Figma has dropped almost 90 percent in the past year from its failure to innovate and compete with top AI companies such as Google and Anthropic and in a couple months they will fall again when OpenAI releases their own AI design tool. Every time an AI company drops a new tool the company falls 6 percent in just one day. It is pretty obvious that they have massive competition and are being out competed by AI meanwhile they don’t make money and most of the money they do make goes to the CEOs yacht fund and the employees second vacation home fund through absurd SBCs. This company will never make money and will continue to act only to make the employees rich while draining investors pockets. Pretty soon we will also see this affect their revenue as many people will start to utilize Google, Anthropic and OpenAI’s own Figma competing AI design tools. If you think SAAS is cooked from AI Figma is absolutely obliterated considering the top AI companies have made better competitors in less than a couple months. TLDR: OpenAI will release a AI design tool competing with Figma and Figma will drop another 20-30 percent. submitted by /u/goxpro1 [link] [comments]
https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-design-anthropic-labs This is a warning to those who think SaaSpocalypse is over and SaaS stocks look like value play. This release proves 2 things: Given a few experts controlling an AI, you can build a competitor very quickly. Anthropic just did. You do not need hundreds of engineers and years of R&D anymore. Those who have access to smart models, chips, and energy will win. Invest in these companies. They're going to be winners no matter what. That said, not all SaaS are the same. If it's a SaaS that AI agents will use a lot more, then those will pop. If you do not have expertise in selecting them, just stick to energy and compute companies. I suggest TSMC and Nvidia as your base investments. They should be a large percentage of a your portfolio. Then you can go a ahead and gamble on some other SaaS that aren't easily replaced and will be used by AI agents. I'm a software developer and I personally do not invest in any SaaS companies. It's not that I think SaaS companies will be made obsolete. It's just that they will not command high PE ratios anymore since it's much cheaper now to build a competitor given the right expertise and compute. I invest in compute & energy stocks only. submitted by /u/Wonderful-Sail-1126 [link] [comments]
Stock prices for Ford, GM and Stellantis for the week ending April 10 USA Today
GM, Ford, Stellantis stocks all up for week ending April 10 Detroit Free Press
How Ford, GM and Stellantis stocks performed for week ending April 2 USA Today
Bisschen Affenweiterbildung: Lesenswerter substack von Paul Krugman über die Gefährdung nationaler Sicherheit durch Insider-Trading unter Trump am Beispiel von Rohöl. submitted by /u/ReasonEcstatic7417 [link] [comments]
Ford, GM EV Sales Plummet. What That Means for the Stocks. Barron's
More than $13M is now deployed across our lending pools on Arbitrum 📈 As on-chain liquidity continues to grow, it’s interesting to see more capital moving toward structured lending and real yield opportunities instead of full, overblown leverage trading. Check Edge & other yield options here- https://www.csigma.finance/ submitted by /u/cSigmaFinance [link] [comments]
Q4 Earnings Outperformers: General Motors (NYSE:GM) And The Rest Of The Automobile Manufacturing Stocks StockStory
Not sure if this has been covered already but I was looking for NVIDIA's by segment revenue. My question is, did they just stop reporting their Singapore related revenue? I'm looking at the last row in the table. Segment Oct '25 Jul '25 Apr '25 Jan '25 (A) Automotive $1.7B $1.2B $567M $1.7B United States $97.8B $44.2B $20.7B $61.3B China (incl. Hong Kong) $16.6B $8.3B $5.5B $17.1B Data Center $131.4B $80.2B $39.1B $115.2B Compute $111.0B $68.0B $34.2B $102.2B Taiwan $30.3B $15.7B $7.2B $20.6B Networking $20.4B $12.2B $5.0B $13.0B Graphics $16.0B $9.9B $4.5B $14.3B Gaming $12.3B $8.1B $3.8B $11.3B Other $3.1B $3.4B $1.6B $7.9B Professional Visualization $1.9B $1.1B $509M $1.9B OEM and Other $458M $284M $111M $389M Singapore $19.2B $9.0B $23.7B (A) = Annual (full fiscal year). Other columns are cumulative year-to-date. NVIDIA fiscal year ends in January. source: https://atlantisdatasolutions.com/nvda/segments submitted by /u/Ok_Performer_7182 [link] [comments]
GM: Stock prices for Ford, GM and Stellantis for the week ending May 15 - USA Today (early_signal, score 0.54)
GM: Stock prices for Ford, GM and Stellantis for the week ending May 15 - USA Today (early_signal, score 0.59)
GM: DSRSD welcomes new assistant GM, finance director - Pleasanton Weekly (early_signal, score 0.51)
GM: The Reason GM Stock Is Beating Ford and Tesla. (It Has Nothing to Do With Cars or Tariffs.) - Barron's (early_signal, score 0.61)
GM: Lithium Prices Surging. LAC Can Actually 5-10x (early_signal, score 0.61)
GM: What market has wrong about Figma and Claude Design (early_signal, score 0.66)
GM: Chevy Blazer EV Discount, Lease, Finance Deals For April 2026 - GM Authority (early_signal, score 0.48)
GM: Stocks to Watch Thursday: Delta Air Lines, General Motors, Exxon - WSJ (early_signal, score 0.56)